Prediction of Thiago Seyboth Wild [112th] vs Daniel Evans [202nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L L L
Form
W L W L L L W W L LH2H: Wild 1 - 1 Evans
They have played 6 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Evans winning 4. The last match between Wild and Evans was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 02-10-2024, First, Hard with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | 1 |
| Daniel Evans | 1 |
| Wild | Stats | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| 21% (3-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (5-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 112 | Ranking | 202 |
| 58 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 25 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 24 |
| 55% (245-198) | Career Total W/L | 59% (572-396) |
| $899,890 | Career Prize Money | $4,992,575 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 7-6(5) |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 26 | Games Won | 33 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:27:36 | Average Match Time | 2:27:36 |
| 63% (117/186) | 1st Serve % | 61% (113/184) |
| 63% (74/117) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (80/113) |
| 52% (36/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (43/71) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 33% (61/184) | Return Points Win % | 41% (76/186) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wild 1 - 1 Evans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 44.91% of points on their second serve, while Evans has won 45.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 43.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 44.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.88% and 28.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 60.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 52.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 41.82% of matches played (W/L 23/ 32), with Evans winning 43.48% (W/L 20/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 200/ 145), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 169/ 104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 50/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wild winning 1 times and Evans being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Evans winning 4. The last match between Wild and Evans was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 02-10-2024, First, Hard with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Evans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wild winning 1 times and Evans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 1, and Evans 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.18 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 194.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 26.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 38.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Alexandre Muller
58%
(
69 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
118)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
37%
(
44 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
122
Total Points Won
114
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Sebastian Baez
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Daniel Evans
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jelle Sels
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniel Evans
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Daniel Evans
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Benoit Paire
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Wild vs Evans?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Wild Vs Evans is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (245/198) | Win/Loss | 59% (572/396) |
| 55% (576/470) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1358/1025) |
| 52% (5205/4789) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12006/10948) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1853 | Aces Total | 2705 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1251 | Total Double Faults | 1917 |
| 1:44:24 | Average Match Time | 1:7:5 |
| 234.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 113.94 |
| 61% (18568/30308) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29251/47891) |
| 70% (12955/18568) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20758/29251) |
| 51% (5990/11740) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9469/18639) |
| 41% (1179/2878) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1802/4411) |
| 39% (11833/30361) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18340/48014) |
| 56% (238/422) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (529/874) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (39/84) |
| 48% (72/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (188/353) |
| 46% (64/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (177/330) |
| 83% (260/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (566/478) |
| 17% (260/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (566/85) |
| 16% (183/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (401/95) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
